April
15
Last night a few lady friends and I had the opportunity to join Pulitzer winning Washington Post journalist Laura Stepp for dinner at a local tavern. Ms. Stepp, among many wonderful things, is the author of Unhooked: How Young Women Pursue Sex, Delay Love, and Lose at Both, in which the author interviews and follows the lives of a handful of high school and college women, caught in the mire of today’s pervasive ”hook up” culture. Stepp chronicles the sexual misadventures of these students as they flit from one salacious encounter to another, often without attachment or responsibility. Unsurprisingly, many of these young women (and their male partners) are left at best unfulfilled, and more often, emotionally bereft.
I was curious to see how the evening would progress. The dinner was organized as an informal discussion time between the author and a dozen or so conservatively-minded readers. Podiums aside, we had the unique chance to chat with Ms. Stepp. The author, whose approach to journalism is refreshingly similar to that of a therapist, was very open with us. I learned that not all of the ladies present were readers of the book, nor we were all conservative. Surprisingly to me, the discussion turned quickly from the book to a few ladies’ need to justify their sexual proclivities to the rest of the group. I was all ears.
A couple of women, early in the evening, made it clear to the rest of the group that they a) thoroughly enjoyed their “sexual freedom” b) had no intention of getting married or having children and c) were angry with “traditional culture” for making them feel as though they must justify their choices to greater society in order to get along. They also mentioned several times that we weren’t the most “diverse” group in the neighborhood, but I don’t hold that against anyone. We were in fact, quite diverse. While not necessarily “women of color” (mostly variants of pretty and peachy Causcasian), we were from all walks of middle class society. We are Jewish. Evangelical. Catholic. Latter-Day Saint. Undergraduates. Mothers. Artists. Law Students. Nurses. MBAs. West Coast. Southern. Midwestern. Pregnant. Single. Happy. Confused. Fairly Diverse, in my opinion, though similarly clad in springy Ann Taylor rain jackets.
My thoughts on the evening:
a) It wasn’t really my place, nor anyone else’s, to comment on another’s choice toward ”sexual freedom”. In fact, no one made any such comments. If a woman (or man, for that matter) wants to have multiple sexual partners, that’s fine by me. We make choices- all choices have repercussions. My choice to be married and stay home with my children has blessed me with two babies (one to arrive this Friday!) and the task of organizing and maintaining a home. But my options are not cornered- I have an opportunity to finish graduate school whenever I want. I also have the blessing of chasing tots around at 30 years of age. Trust me. Tots are tiring. I’m glad I’m only 30. If these women want to try it the other way around, I wish them the best, and I am certain they will be tired. Fortunately for them, we live in a culture where they can do exactly that if they so choose. I don’t know why they were complaining.
b) The very fact that were we able to have a dinner conversation between women who are pleased as punch to stay home with their kids, undecided women, and women who have no intention of having either husbands or kids is one of the greatest achievements of the Feminist movement. I believe that is something Ms. Stepp should be quite proud of, as a former self-described “bell-bottom-clad Vietnam War protester”. Good work, Ms. Stepp. Thanks for a long and hard fight. While I don’t label myself a Feminist in the modern definition, I am proud to thank those who got the ball rolling so that I may enjoy the choices I have.
c) What I find interesting is that these few women were intent on justifying their decisions to a group that they clearly felt were antagonistic toward their choices. No one affirmed or contended the choice to have a career and remain single and child-free, yet over and over again, these women pointed out that they are expected to have families and that men expect them to want marriage. Another woman present at the table wisely pointed out that young men, too, are expected to want marriage and family. This situation is not unique to women.
d) It seemed to me that these women spent the evening combatting their own inner demons, projecting their own expectations for what they “should” want on to us, the “conservative” members of the dinner party. They argued as if an empathic response or some kind of catharsis on our part would have set them at ease. If this is indeed the case, I hope they explore the decisions ahead of them with true flexibility. They presented their own choices as finalized- definite. And that darn well better have been okay with us, cause that’s where they stood. But is it where they stand? I don’t think so- for they were arguing with themselves. They truly did not seem happy with the finality of their decisions. The pressure to decide, to make a stand, did not come from us. We just wanted to talk about a book.
e) The pressure to take a stand and to defend that stance is the very essence of political activism. It is my wish for these women that their political attitudes would not so overwhelm their personal choices that they feel they must choose a side at 23 years of age and stick to it forever. Laura Stepp, in fact, pursued her career and yet had the maturity to own up to the fact that behind her reporter’s desk she yearned for her baby boy, waiting for her at home. What a beautiful career she has woven- and all because she recognized her role as a mother. Her most distinguished works are those whose genesis came from her curiosity in her own child’s social and physical development. We, as her readers, are the fortunate beneficiaries.
f) The very movement that gave Ms. Stepp the freedom to make the choice for both motherhood and career has sadly become a movement marked by inflexibility. I believe the true essence of Feminism is the freedom to choose one’s destiny, not as prescribed by society, but as prescribed by one’s own heart. Sadly, Feminism in the early aughts (or “aughties” for some) has turned its face from one of flexibility to focus on victimhood and lack of choice. The young women present at dinner last night were clearly not thriving beneath that banner. What Feminism has become is not empowering- it is in fact quite limiting in its focus on victimhood. True sexual freedom is found not by those who have many partners at many times and many whims. They are left unsatisfied. I believe sexual freedom is found by those who know themselves, know what they want, and have the grace and freedom to change their minds with age and experience. These young women did not understand or feel the freedom to change their minds, and they are left wanting. For me, sexual freedom is found in marriage- happy marriage. My choice.
I’m rooting for these girls. I was pleased to have met them last night. I wish them all the best, as I am certain Ms. Stepp does as well.
Ms. Stepp- thank you for coming to Charlottesville. Your presence sparked a lively conversation, one of which I hope you were pleased to serve as catalyst. I wish you and your endeavors many blessings and I am pleased to have made your acquaintance.
Now I’m going to go give birth to my 2nd daughter, not sleep for weeks on end, complain about it all, and feel wonderfully blessed and loved.